<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Detecting satisficing through instructional manipulation checks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.baqmar.be/?feed=rss2&#038;p=1955" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.baqmar.be/?p=1955</link>
	<description>the Belgian Association for Quantitative and Qualitative Marketing Research</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:51:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bert Vandecasteele</title>
		<link>http://www.baqmar.be/?p=1955&#038;cpage=1#comment-1248</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Vandecasteele</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 09:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.baqmar.be/?p=1955#comment-1248</guid>
		<description>Very nice ánd very easy method to detect satisficing. I used their method last year in an internet survey and had 25% satisficers! If I would not have incorporated that simple item, my model would have been worthless... But now, without those satisficers, I have a nice result :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice ánd very easy method to detect satisficing. I used their method last year in an internet survey and had 25% satisficers! If I would not have incorporated that simple item, my model would have been worthless&#8230; But now, without those satisficers, I have a nice result <img src='http://www.baqmar.be/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
